OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows

The best workflows and configurations I've developed, having heavily used Claude Code since the day of it's release. Workflows are based off applied...

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows has 3.5k+ stars and 550+ forks on GitHub and was last pushed on Oct 9, 2026. Data as of . Signed-in members get hourly updates — create a free account.

Summary Information

Updated 48 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 30th, 2026
Created on August 12th, 2025
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 9 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 562
Total Stargazers: 3,905 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 102 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 2.1 days
Mean response time: 19.0 days
90th percentile: 64.9 days
Tracked items: 4

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 5
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 286 days
Stale 30+ days: 5
Stale 90+ days: 5

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

No label distribution available yet.

Most active issues this week

Sign in to see which issues are moving.
Sign in

Detailed Description

Claude Code Workflows is a collection of workflow templates and configurations for automating code review, security scanning, and design validation using Claude Code and GitHub Actions.

The project addresses the challenge of scaling code quality checks across teams by automating routine review tasks that consume engineering time. It provides three main workflows that delegate blocking tasks to AI agents while freeing human reviewers to focus on strategic decisions. The code review workflow implements a dual-loop architecture with slash commands and GitHub Actions to check syntax, completeness, style adherence, and potential bugs. The security review workflow proactively scans for vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, and attack vectors using OWASP Top 10 standards, classifying findings by severity with remediation guidance. The design review workflow uses browser automation to validate UI/UX consistency, accessibility compliance, and design standards on front-end changes.

Teams building with Claude Code who want to reduce manual review overhead should consider these workflows. They suit organizations that have adopted Claude Code as a development tool and want to extend it into their pull request and quality assurance processes. The workflows are particularly valuable for AI-native startups or teams comfortable delegating routine checks to automated agents, as they require integration with GitHub Actions and familiarity with Claude Code's capabilities.

The project is actively developed with detailed tutorials and demonstrations available, indicating ongoing refinement based on practical experience. Additional workflows are planned for future release, suggesting the maintainer continues to extract and document learnings from production use.