enocom/gopher-reading-list

A curated selection of blog posts on Go

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 37 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 8th, 2026
Created on February 21st, 2018
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 30 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 564
Total Stargazers: 8,044 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 297 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 12.3 days
Mean response time: 22.9 days
90th percentile: 85.5 days
Tracked items: 12

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 13
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 477 days
Stale 30+ days: 13
Stale 90+ days: 13

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • advanced (12)
  • intermediate (7)
  • beginner (2)

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

Gopher Reading List is a curated reading list of blog posts about Go.

The project addresses the challenge of navigating the growing volume of Go-related blog content by maintaining a carefully selected collection of the most useful and relevant material for developers writing Go. Rather than attempting to be comprehensive, it constrains itself to a fixed set of entries, ensuring quality over quantity. The list is organized by skill level, starting with foundational concepts like pointers, channels, and slices, then progressing to more advanced topics. Readers can discover additional material through the project's issue tracker, where community members suggest posts that may or may not be added to the main list.

The reading list suits developers at any stage of learning Go who want guidance on which blog posts are worth their time. It works well as a reference for someone beginning with Go, offering a structured path through essential concepts, and equally for experienced developers seeking authoritative treatments of specific topics. The project explicitly acknowledges that it is a work in progress and invites community contributions, though new additions must replace existing entries to maintain the fixed length.

The project maintains a stable, curated collection with community input driving updates. The maintainer actively reviews suggestions submitted through issues and makes deliberate decisions about what enters and leaves the list. The constraint of fixed length means each addition requires careful consideration of what it displaces, reflecting a thoughtful approach to curation rather than passive accumulation.