open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib

Contrib repository for the OpenTelemetry Collector

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓Open shareable report →

Data as of . Signed-in members get hourly updates — create a free account.

Summary Information

Updated 54 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on April 2nd, 2023
Created on July 11th, 2019
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 969 (+1)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 3,993
Total Stargazers: 4,983 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 68 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 30.1 hours
Mean response time: 45.3 days
90th percentile: 97.9 days
Tracked items: 5,772

Maintainer activity

271 people did triage or write work on this repository in the last 12 months.

At least 7% of opentelemetry-collector-contrib's 271 maintainers work at Elastic. 136 say where they work, and 20 of those are Elastic.

OpenTelemetry owns this repository. 1 of its person did this work here, and is not included above.

Counts unlabeled, assigned, unassigned, milestoned, demilestoned, locked, unlocked over the last 12 months. These are issue and pull request events that require triage or write permission. Commits and code review are not counted. labeled and renamed are excluded because GitHub issue forms record the issue author as the actor. Figures from October 7, 2026. This count is not comparable across projects: each project's automation decides which of these events a person emits.

How this project is maintained

About 9% of issues opened in the past year have never received a reply. 71% of open issues come from outside the core team, so the backlog reflects real-world use rather than internal planning. Work labelled "ci-cd" is answered fastest, typically in about 11 hours, while "never stale" waits about 8 days. 13% of tracked open issues have had no activity in three months. 78% of issues opened in the past year have been closed, leaving a working backlog.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 644
New in 7 days: 48
Closed in 7 days: 46
Avg open age: 245 days
Stale 30+ days: 378
Stale 90+ days: 189

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 37
Closed in 7 days: 32
Comments in 7 days: 80
Events in 7 days: 410

Top labels

  • Stale (2,121)
  • enhancement (2,102)
  • bug (1,896)
  • closed as inactive (1,642)
  • needs triage (878)
  • waiting-for-code-owners (553)
  • never stale (517)
  • help wanted (367)

Most active issues this week

Sign in to see which issues are moving.
Sign in

Detailed Description

The OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib repository serves as a centralized hub for OpenTelemetry Collector components that fall outside the scope of the core repository. Written in Go, this project hosts a diverse collection of receivers, processors, and exporters that enable organizations to collect, process, and export telemetry data including traces, metrics, and logs across distributed systems. The repository explicitly distinguishes itself from the core collector by housing components deemed unsuitable for inclusion there, though some widely-used components like Jaeger and Prometheus exporters are distributed as part of both core and contrib releases through the opentelemetry-collector-releases repository.

The project emphasizes flexibility in deployment through the OpenTelemetry Collector Builder, which allows users to construct custom distributions by selecting components from the core repository, contrib repository, or third-party sources. Each component maintains its own stability level per signal type, meaning a single component might be stable for traces while remaining in alpha for metrics or development stages for logs. This granular stability model sets clear expectations for users depending on specific components for production workloads.

The most active labels tracked are enhancement with 1807 items, Stale with 1758 items, and bug with 1577 items, indicating ongoing feature development alongside maintenance of existing functionality.

The repository maintains a structured governance model with distinct roles including maintainers, approvers, and triagers drawn from organizations like Splunk, Elastic, Honeycomb, Dynatrace, DataDog, and Grafana Labs. Support for individual components is distributed across community maintainers and vendor-specific teams, with the broader maintainer group retaining authority to downgrade components deemed unmaintained or posing risks to the distribution. The project explicitly notes that actual support typically flows from individual contributors and code owners rather than centralized teams.

Feature gating mechanisms allow experimental functionality to be hidden behind gates before integration into main code paths, with these gates themselves subject to defined lifecycle stages. The repository's classification spans processors, telemetry collection, tracing, logging, instrumentation, exporters, observability, receivers, and metrics, reflecting its comprehensive role in the observability ecosystem.