buildpacks/rfcs

RFCs for Cloud Native Buildpacks

Hosted by Cloud Native Computing Foundation · part of Linux Foundation

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

buildpacks/rfcs has 50+ stars and 70+ forks on GitHub, is written in Shell, and was last pushed on Oct 8, 2026. Data as of . Signed-in members get hourly updates — create a free account.

Summary Information

Updated 50 minutes ago
Type:Documentation / SpecificationCategory(s):Documentation ToolsDeveloper Tools
Added to GitGenius on October 15th, 2026
Created on April 9th, 2019
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 67 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 77
Total Stargazers: 59 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 19 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 2.0 hours
Mean response time: 23.0 days
90th percentile: 87.8 days
Tracked items: 4

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 6
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 1,045 days
Stale 30+ days: 6
Stale 90+ days: 6

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • type/tracking (5)
  • size/large (1)
  • size/medium (1)
  • type/idea (1)

Most active issues this week

Sign in to see which issues are moving.
Sign in

Detailed Description

Cloud Native Buildpacks RFCs is a request-for-comments system for proposing and discussing substantial changes to the Cloud Native Buildpacks project.

The tool addresses the need for structured community input on major project decisions. Proposals are submitted as pull requests containing RFC documents that describe the change, its motivation, and tradeoffs. The process moves through discussion phases where community members and working groups provide feedback, then enters a final comment period where binding votes from core team members determine acceptance. This approach ensures that significant changes receive broad review and documented consensus before implementation.

Teams adopting this RFC process should expect a formal governance structure suitable for projects with multiple stakeholders and a need for transparent decision-making. It works best for projects where changes affect multiple audiences—such as buildpack authors, platform operators, or specification implementers—and where decisions benefit from documented rationale. The process includes labeling mechanisms to route RFCs to relevant audiences and working groups, and it explicitly prevents any single company from dominating voting outcomes.

The project maintains active discussion through weekly working group meetings where RFCs are reviewed and debated. Pull requests serve as the primary discussion venue, with external conversations summarized back into the thread. The team applies structured labels to categorize RFCs by specification area and audience, and moves proposals through clearly defined stages from active development to final comment period. Voting requires a supermajority of core team members to approve, with a seven-day final comment period that can close early only with unanimous agreement.