aipentest/cyberstrikeai

The system of action for AI-native cybersecurity—where intent becomes governed execution, evidence becomes operational memory, and every operation improves...

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓Open shareable report

Summary Information

Updated 16 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 10th, 2026
Created on November 8th, 2025
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 71 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 1,060
Total Stargazers: 6,559 (+1)
Total Subscribers: 44 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 2.6 hours
Mean response time: 3.2 days
90th percentile: 5.6 days
Tracked items: 178

How this project is maintained

Around half of the issues opened in the past year never receive a reply. 98% of open issues come from outside the core team, so the backlog reflects real-world use rather than internal planning. 24% of tracked open issues have had no activity in three months. Only 18% of issues opened in the past year have been closed. Three people close 89% of everything that gets resolved.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 55
New in 7 days: 15
Closed in 7 days: 8
Avg open age: 53 days
Stale 30+ days: 30
Stale 90+ days: 13

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 15
Closed in 7 days: 8
Comments in 7 days: 2
Events in 7 days: 14

Top labels

  • bug (15)
  • enhancement (14)
  • documentation (1)
  • question (1)

Most active issues this week

Detailed Description

CyberStrikeAI is an AI-native cybersecurity platform that orchestrates authorized penetration testing and security operations through AI agents, evidence tracking, and auditable workflows.

The tool addresses the challenge of coordinating complex security assessments by connecting planning, execution, human oversight, and evidence collection in a single workspace. It uses Eino-powered agents to drive operations, integrates MCP-native tools for extensibility, applies RAG knowledge systems to inform decisions, and models attack chains to analyze security posture. Operations are recorded as auditable evidence that feeds back into the system, allowing subsequent operations to learn from prior results.

Teams conducting authorized security testing should evaluate this tool if they need visibility into how AI agents make decisions during penetration testing, want to maintain an auditable record of all actions taken, or require human oversight checkpoints before high-risk operations execute. The platform is built in Go and includes capabilities for visual workflow design, WebShell access, and C2 functionality. The README emphasizes that users must own or have explicit authorization for any systems tested, and recommends reviewing the security model and hardening guide before enabling high-risk features in shared or production environments.

The project shows active development with regular updates to core functionality. The codebase demonstrates attention to security concerns through dedicated documentation on security hardening and threat modeling. Documentation is maintained in multiple languages, indicating effort toward accessibility for a broader audience. The tool integrates with established frameworks and protocols, suggesting a focus on compatibility with existing security workflows rather than isolation.