you-dont-need/you-dont-need-lodash-underscore

List of JavaScript methods which you can use natively + ESLint Plugin

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 7 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 3rd, 2026
Created on January 26th, 2016
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 63 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 814
Total Stargazers: 19,133 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 198 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 142.4 days
Mean response time: 366.7 days
90th percentile: 1300.6 days
Tracked items: 7

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 6
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 870 days
Stale 30+ days: 6
Stale 90+ days: 4

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • PR welcome (2)

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

You Don't Need Lodash/Underscore is a reference guide and ESLint plugin that identifies native JavaScript alternatives to Lodash and Underscore utility functions.

The project addresses dependency bloat by documenting which Lodash and Underscore methods have native equivalents in modern JavaScript standards. It catalogs methods across ES5 and ES6, showing developers how to replace library calls with built-in language features. The accompanying ESLint plugin automatically detects Lodash and Underscore usage in codebases and flags opportunities to use native methods instead, helping teams reduce external dependencies when targeting modern browsers.

Developers should adopt this tool if they work with modern browser environments and want to minimize dependencies without sacrificing functionality. It suits projects where reducing the dependency tree is a priority and where the target runtime reliably supports ES5 and ES6 features. The README notes that Lodash provides additional options beyond native built-ins for some functions, so this is not a one-to-one replacement guide; it also cautions that native equivalents lack the null-safety guarantees of some Lodash methods, requiring defensive coding patterns where null safety is critical.

The project actively welcomes pull requests to expand and refine its method catalog, with contribution encouraged through the issue tracker.