shengxinjing/programmer-job-blacklist

:see_no_evil:程序员找工作黑名单,换工作和当技术合伙人需谨慎啊 更新有赞

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 53 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 2nd, 2026
Created on June 25th, 2016
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 171 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 1,770
Total Stargazers: 28,396 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 1,174 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 0.0 hours
Mean response time: 49.7 days
90th percentile: 348.0 days
Tracked items: 7

Most active contributors

Sign in to see contributor activity.

Related repositories by overlapping contributors

No overlapping-contributor repos identified yet.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 9
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 750 days
Stale 30+ days: 6
Stale 90+ days: 5

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

No label distribution available yet.

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

Programmer Job Blacklist is a crowdsourced repository that documents companies and individuals with problematic employment practices or conduct in the technology industry.

The repository addresses the problem of job seekers lacking visibility into workplace red flags and unethical employer behavior. It works by collecting and linking to public discussions, news articles, and employee accounts of issues such as wage theft, exploitative work practices, harassment, and unfair treatment. The maintainer emphasizes that the list is not meant to condemn entire organizations based on isolated incidents, but rather to document patterns of serious misconduct that job candidates should consider when evaluating opportunities. The repository distinguishes between minor workplace grievances and substantive violations like unpaid wages or systematic mistreatment.

Programmers considering whether to use this resource should understand it serves as a reference for due diligence during job searches and partnership evaluations. It is most useful for those in the Chinese technology market, where the documented cases are concentrated. The repository is maintained through community contributions via issues and pull requests, allowing collective knowledge-sharing about problematic employers and individuals. Users should approach entries with critical judgment, as the maintainer acknowledges that every company and person has flaws, and context matters when evaluating whether an incident warrants avoidance.

The project maintains an open invitation for community participation in identifying and documenting cases. Updates are driven by user submissions and discussions rather than systematic monitoring, making the list a reflection of what the community chooses to report and highlight.