rust-lang/mdbook

Create book from markdown files. Like Gitbook but implemented in Rust

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 29 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 2nd, 2026
Created on July 7th, 2015
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 661 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 1,899
Total Stargazers: 22,126 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 116 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Most active contributors

Sign in to see contributor activity.

Related repositories by overlapping contributors

No overlapping-contributor repos identified yet.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Issue API getrepoissuespagesummary failed: 429 Rate limit exceeded. Please try again later.

Detailed Description

mdBook is a command-line tool that creates books from markdown files, implemented in Rust.

The tool solves the problem of converting a collection of markdown documents into a formatted, navigable book. It reads markdown files organized in a directory structure, processes them according to a configuration file, and generates static HTML output that readers can browse. The approach treats the book as a series of chapters defined by markdown files, with a table of contents that can be automatically generated or manually specified.

mdBook suits projects that need to publish documentation, tutorials, or long-form content as a cohesive book rather than scattered web pages. It works well for technical documentation, educational materials, and any scenario where markdown source files need to become a polished, browsable book. The tool is particularly appropriate for teams already comfortable with markdown and version control, since the entire book lives as text files in a repository. Those evaluating alternatives should note that the README positions mdBook as similar to Gitbook but built in Rust, offering a self-contained binary without external dependencies.

The project maintains a steady stream of commits addressing bug fixes and incremental improvements. Pull requests receive timely review and feedback from maintainers. The issue tracker shows active engagement, with maintainers responding to bug reports and feature requests. Development follows a measured pace focused on stability and reliability rather than rapid feature expansion. The project accepts community contributions and processes them through a standard review workflow.