mikubaka88/CCFA-Skills

A skill family for shaping the research storyline of CCF-A papers.

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

mikubaka88/CCFA-Skills has 3k+ stars and 100+ forks on GitHub, is written in TeX, and was last pushed on Oct 15, 2026. Data as of . Signed-in members get hourly updates — create a free account.

Summary Information

Updated 40 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on October 9th, 2026
Created on June 4th, 2026
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 8 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 135
Total Stargazers: 3,129 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 2 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 14.0 days
Mean response time: 17.7 days
90th percentile: 39.0 days
Tracked items: 6

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 4
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 76 days
Stale 30+ days: 4
Stale 90+ days: 0

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

No label distribution available yet.

Most active issues this week

Sign in to see which issues are moving.
Sign in

Detailed Description

CCFA Skills is a skill family for shaping the research storyline of academic papers submitted to CCF-A venues.

The project addresses a fundamental problem in academic writing: research with strong ideas often fails to communicate effectively because the narrative becomes fragmented through iterative revision. As experiments accumulate, related work expands, and feedback arrives from reviewers, the original research question can become buried and the logical thread connecting evidence to conclusions breaks apart. The tool solves this by organizing the writing process into seventeen specialized skills that work in sequence, each maintaining the connection between research questions, evidence, and conclusions as work passes from one skill to the next. Rather than treating a paper as a document to be filled in section by section, the approach treats it as a coherent story that must remain intelligible through multiple rounds of modification.

The project suits researchers preparing submissions for academic venues, particularly those working on papers where maintaining a clear argumentative structure through revision cycles is critical. It is designed specifically for CCF-A conference standards and includes venue-specific guidance. The skills span from initial idea formulation through literature review, experimental design, writing, figure creation, peer review, rebuttal, and final submission. Someone considering adoption should understand that this is not a general-purpose writing tool but rather a structured workflow that enforces separation of concerns—literature retrieval follows different principles than experimental reporting, which differs from argumentative writing, which differs from independent review.

The project maintains active development with regular updates to align with changing conference requirements and submission guidelines. Documentation is comprehensive and available in multiple languages, reflecting attention to accessibility for international researchers. The tool integrates with multiple AI agents and includes automated update mechanisms, indicating ongoing maintenance and adaptation to evolving infrastructure.