hughyau/qiushi-skill

Qiushi-Skill: Build agents that investigate first, focus on the main contradiction, validate in practice, and keep pushing until the work is actually done....

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓Open shareable report

Summary Information

Updated 1 hour ago
Added to GitGenius on September 18th, 2026
Created on March 25th, 2026
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 19 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 285
Total Stargazers: 3,787 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 12 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 2.9 hours
Mean response time: 37.3 hours
90th percentile: 5.3 days
Tracked items: 34

Most active contributors

Sign in to see contributor activity.

How this project is maintained

Roughly one issue in four opened in the past year never receives a reply. Only 58% of issues opened in the past year have been closed. Three people close 88% of everything that gets resolved.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 19
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 155 days
Stale 30+ days: 19
Stale 90+ days: 18

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

No label distribution available yet.

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

Qiushi-Skill is a collection of AI agent skills that equips language models with a systematic methodology drawn from dialectical materialism and practical philosophy.

The project addresses a fundamental limitation in current AI agents: they can process information but lack a principled approach to problem-solving. Rather than grasping at all aspects of a complex problem simultaneously, agents built with Qiushi-Skill learn to identify the primary contradiction, conduct thorough investigation before responding, validate solutions through practice, and persist in pushing work toward completion. The methodology comprises one overarching principle and nine distinct tools, each grounded in classical philosophical texts rather than generic heuristics.

Developers should adopt this tool if they are building agents that need to handle complex, multi-faceted problems where identifying the core issue matters more than generating quick answers. It suits projects where agents must demonstrate persistence, self-correction, and the ability to distinguish between surface-level symptoms and underlying contradictions. The tool is particularly relevant for applications requiring agents to investigate thoroughly before committing to a course of action, rather than defaulting to predetermined responses or claiming tasks exceed their capabilities.

The project shows active development with ongoing refinement of its methodology framework and documentation. The codebase demonstrates sustained attention to the core concept, with each skill method accompanied by references to original philosophical texts to ground the approach in established thought rather than ad-hoc principles.