future-house/paper-qa

High accuracy RAG for answering questions from scientific documents with citations

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓Open shareable report

Summary Information

Updated 6 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 7th, 2026
Created on February 5th, 2023
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 145 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 917
Total Stargazers: 9,173 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 67 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 8.4 hours
Mean response time: 36.7 days
90th percentile: 114.3 days
Tracked items: 252

How this project is maintained

Around half of the issues opened in the past year never receive a reply. 80% of open issues come from outside the core team, so the backlog reflects real-world use rather than internal planning. Work labelled "bug" is answered fastest, typically in about an hour, while "enhancement" waits about 4 days. Only 7% of issues opened in the past year have been closed. Three people close 77% of everything that gets resolved.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 132
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 676 days
Stale 30+ days: 131
Stale 90+ days: 129

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • bug (113)
  • question (81)
  • enhancement (46)
  • documentation (23)
  • needs information (2)
  • good first issue (1)

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

PaperQA2 is a retrieval augmented generation tool for answering questions from scientific documents with citations.

The tool addresses the challenge of extracting accurate, cited answers from large collections of scientific literature. It works by ingesting PDFs, text files, Microsoft Office documents, and source code files, then building a full-text search index with cached embeddings. When a user poses a question, the system retrieves relevant document passages and uses an LLM agent to synthesize answers grounded in those sources, returning results with explicit citations. The approach emphasizes high accuracy on scientific tasks including question answering, summarization, and contradiction detection.

Developers should adopt this tool if they need to build applications that answer questions about scientific literature with verifiable sources. It suits projects where citation accuracy and traceability matter more than speed alone, and where the document collection is primarily scientific papers or technical documents. The README distinguishes the tool from LlamaIndex and LangChain by highlighting its specialized focus on scientific literature and its demonstrated superhuman performance on domain-specific tasks, though it does not provide detailed feature comparisons with those frameworks.

The project maintains active development with regular updates to its core algorithms and capabilities. The tool supports both agentic and manual workflows for document processing, allowing users to choose between automated agent-driven indexing or explicit control over the pipeline. Configuration is flexible, with bundled settings for common scenarios, customizable prompts, and support for multiple embedding models including locally hosted options. The system provides caching mechanisms for embeddings and external vector database integration, reducing redundant computation across queries.