electron/governance

Public repository for governance issues and documents

Hosted by OpenJS Foundation · part of Linux Foundation

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

electron/governance has 150+ stars and 150+ forks on GitHub, is written in Shell, and was last pushed on Sep 28, 2026. Data as of . Signed-in members get hourly updates — create a free account.

Summary Information

Updated 1 hour ago
Added to GitGenius on October 15th, 2026
Created on January 30th, 2019
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 6 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 168
Total Stargazers: 167 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 46 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 0.0 hours
Mean response time: 13.0 days
90th percentile: 51.9 days
Tracked items: 4

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 4
New in 7 days: 3
Closed in 7 days: 1
Avg open age: 807 days
Stale 30+ days: 2
Stale 90+ days: 2

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 3
Closed in 7 days: 1
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • :speech_balloon: question (1)

Most active issues this week

Sign in to see which issues are moving.
Sign in

Detailed Description

Electron Governance is a public repository documenting the organizational structure and decision-making processes for the Electron project.

The repository addresses how a large open-source project coordinates work across multiple domains. Electron uses a Working Group model where specialized teams oversee different aspects of the ecosystem: API design, community safety, ecosystem health, outreach, releases, security, infrastructure upgrades, and administrative conflict resolution. Each Working Group maintains its own charter, meeting notes, and decision-making rules, with a rotating chair model to distribute leadership responsibility.

This repository is essential for contributors and maintainers who need to understand how Electron makes decisions and where to engage on specific topics. The structure suits projects large enough to require specialized focus areas but that want to maintain transparent, distributed governance rather than top-down control. The Working Group approach means decisions happen closer to the relevant expertise, and meeting notes are publicly available so the community can follow discussions and outcomes.

The project maintains active documentation of governance structures with regularly updated meeting notes across all Working Groups, indicating ongoing engagement with the governance model rather than static documentation. The repository demonstrates consistent use of the rotating chair model and explicit commitment to good-faith collaboration between groups, suggesting the governance system is actively tested and refined through practice.