derv82/wifite2

Rewrite of the popular wireless network auditor, "wifite"

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 35 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 8th, 2026
Created on May 30th, 2015
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 350 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 1,730
Total Stargazers: 8,110 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 371 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 4.1 days
Mean response time: 192.9 days
90th percentile: 859.4 days
Tracked items: 46

How this project is maintained

Around half of the issues opened in the past year never receive a reply. 99% of open issues come from outside the core team, so the backlog reflects real-world use rather than internal planning. Only 5% of issues opened in the past year have been closed.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 69
New in 7 days: 1
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 918 days
Stale 30+ days: 63
Stale 90+ days: 59

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 1
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • bug (1)
  • enhancement (1)
  • needs examples (1)

Most active issues this week

Detailed Description

Wifite2 is a wireless network auditor that automates the execution of existing wireless-auditing tools to retrieve access point passwords.

The tool addresses the complexity of manually running multiple wireless security utilities by orchestrating them automatically. It implements known attack methods against wireless networks including WPS Offline Pixie-Dust attacks, WPS Online Brute-Force PIN attacks, WPA Handshake Capture with offline cracking, PMKID Hash Capture with offline cracking, and various WEP attacks such as fragmentation, chop-chop, and aireplay techniques. Users select targets and the tool handles the sequence of operations needed to attempt password recovery.

Wifite2 is designed specifically for Kali Linux with support for ParrotSec, and requires a wireless adapter capable of Monitor Mode and packet injection. The tool depends on the Aircrack-ng suite and related utilities, which must be installed and up-to-date. Adoption is most appropriate for penetration testers and security researchers working in supported Linux environments who want to streamline wireless auditing workflows without manually invoking individual command-line tools.

The project maintains a stable codebase with infrequent updates, suggesting a mature tool that has reached a stable state rather than active ongoing development. Pull requests are reviewed and merged periodically, indicating continued maintenance and community contribution acceptance. Issue responses occur but at a measured pace, reflecting a project that addresses problems without rapid iteration cycles.