anthropics/claude-for-legal

A suite of plugins for legal workflows

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 33 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 1st, 2026
Created on April 21st, 2026
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 69 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 1,827
Total Stargazers: 9,387 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 114 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Most active contributors

Sign in to see contributor activity.

Related repositories by overlapping contributors

No overlapping-contributor repos identified yet.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 19
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 89 days
Stale 30+ days: 16
Stale 90+ days: 13

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

No label distribution available yet.

Most active issues this week

Detailed Description

Claude for Legal is a suite of plugins for legal workflows that runs either as a Claude Cowork or Claude Code plugin or through the Claude Managed Agents API.

The tool addresses the need to accelerate legal review and analysis across multiple practice areas by providing pre-built agents, skills, and data connectors tailored to common legal work. It operates through a cold-start interview that learns a team's playbook, storing preferences in a practice profile that all skills reference. The system includes named agents for specific workflows like vendor agreement review, data subject access request response, and termination review, alongside managed-agent cookbooks for scheduled monitoring tasks such as renewal watching and docket tracking. Connectors integrate with both general productivity tools and legal-specific systems including document management, contract platforms, and court databases.

The tool is designed for in-house legal teams, law firms, and academic legal clinics working across commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, litigation, regulatory, AI governance, and intellectual property matters. It suits teams that want to standardize workflows while maintaining attorney oversight. The README emphasizes that all outputs are drafts requiring attorney review and professional responsibility; the plugins include guardrails such as source attribution on citations, conservative defaults on privilege questions, surfaced jurisdiction assumptions, and explicit gates before outputs are filed or sent. The tool makes attorney review faster but does not replace it.

The project maintains active development across multiple integration points, with connectors spanning established legal software platforms and general workplace tools. The codebase includes comprehensive practice-area plugins, managed-agent cookbooks for monitoring workflows, and a modular skill architecture that reads from centralized practice profiles. Documentation includes a quickstart guide and reference materials for both plugin installation and API deployment paths.