0xnyk/council-of-high-intelligence

Structured multi-perspective deliberation for hard decisions. Run full councils, focused triads, or duo debates across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and...

View on GitHub ↗Jump to charts ↓

Summary Information

Updated 7 minutes ago
Added to GitGenius on September 16th, 2026
Created on March 2nd, 2026
Open Issues & Pull Requests: 16 (+0)
GitHub issues: Enabled
Number of forks: 411
Total Stargazers: 4,347 (+0)
Total Subscribers: 21 (+0)

Repository Insights (GitGenius)

Median issue/PR response: 29.2 days
Mean response time: 24.9 days
90th percentile: 41.6 days
Tracked items: 16

Most active contributors

Sign in to see contributor activity.

Charts & Analytics

Fetching additional details & charts...

Issue Activity (beta)

Open issues: 7
New in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Avg open age: 54 days
Stale 30+ days: 5
Stale 90+ days: 0

Recent activity

Opened in 7 days: 0
Closed in 7 days: 0
Comments in 7 days: 0
Events in 7 days: 0

Top labels

  • enhancement (9)

Most active issues this week

No issue events were indexed in the last 7 days.

Detailed Description

Council of High Intelligence is a multi-agent deliberation framework that orchestrates structured debates across multiple large language models to reach well-reasoned decisions on complex problems.

The tool addresses the challenge of making sound decisions on difficult questions by leveraging multiple AI perspectives in a structured format. Rather than relying on a single model's output, it coordinates deliberation sessions where different models present arguments, challenge assumptions, and build consensus. Users can configure the scope of deliberation by running full councils with many participants, focused triads with three models, or duo debates between two models. The framework supports integration with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and OpenCode, allowing developers to mix and match models within a single deliberation session.

The project suits teams and developers who need to reason through complex technical or strategic decisions and want to reduce the risk of overlooking important considerations. It works well for scenarios where a single model's perspective might miss edge cases or where exploring multiple viewpoints before committing to a direction adds value. The structured debate format is particularly useful when decisions have significant consequences and stakeholders benefit from seeing the reasoning process unfold across different AI agents.

The project shows active development with regular commits addressing core functionality and user-facing features. Work spans implementation of deliberation orchestration logic, integration with multiple model providers, and refinement of the debate structure itself. The codebase receives updates that expand supported models and improve the framework's ability to coordinate meaningful exchanges between agents. Development appears focused on making the deliberation process both technically robust and practically useful for real decision-making scenarios.